What is the best database to store schema.org data?

I asked ChatGpt which is best database to store schema.org data and here is the answer.

Gemini Generated Image m5bxnim5bxnim5bx 1 scaled

Chat history

Invite team members

You said:

what is the best data base to store schema.org data

ChatGPT said:

Thought for 8s

There isn’t one “best” database for Schema.org data—because Schema.org is a vocabulary, and the right storage depends on how you’ll query and evolve the data.

If you want a practical default

PostgreSQL (with JSONB) is usually the best starting point:

If your main value is relationships and traversal

Use a graph database (property graph), like Neo4j, when you’ll ask questions like:

If you need standards-based semantic querying (Linked Data)

Use an RDF triplestore / SPARQL engine (e.g., GraphDB, Virtuoso, Jena/Fuseki, Amazon Neptune’s RDF mode) when:

Common “best in practice” architecture

Many teams do a hybrid:

  1. Store raw JSON-LD in Postgres (JSONB) or object storage (source of truth)
  2. Build a derived graph view (Neo4j/Neptune) for relationship queries
  3. Optionally index into Elasticsearch/OpenSearch for fast text search (“typeahead”, ranking, fuzzy matching)

Quick chooser

If you tell me what you’re doing with the Schema.org data (search? knowledge graph? analytics? dedupe via sameAs? SPARQL needed?), I’ll recommend a specific setup and schema pattern.

You said:

search and knowledge graph, analytics and intelligence as well

ChatGPT said:

Thought for 19s

For search + knowledge graph + analytics/intelligence on Schema.org (JSON-LD), the “best database” is almost always a stack (each layer does what it’s best at).

Recommended “best-in-practice” stack

1) System of record (raw + canonical entities)

PostgreSQL (JSONB)

2) Search layer (fast relevance + faceting)

OpenSearch

3) Knowledge graph layer (relationships, traversal, reasoning-ish queries)

Neo4j (property graph) is a strong default if your queries are traversal-heavy and you want a mature developer experience with CypherGraph Database & Analytics+1
Use this for things like entity resolution graphs (sameAs clusters), offers → itemOfferedcontainedInPlaceprovider, “paths between entities”, etc.

4) Analytics layer (OLAP + BI)

ClickHouse (or a cloud warehouse) for fast OLAP over events, entity snapshots, and derived features. ClickHouse is explicitly oriented toward large-scale analytical workloads. ClickHouse+1


How the pieces fit together

  1. Ingest JSON-LD → Postgres (raw)
  2. Normalize → canonical entities + extracted fields (name, geo, type, category, timestamps, popularity signals)
  3. Index for search → OpenSearch (documents per entity + per page + per offer/event, depending on your product)
  4. Build KG → Neo4j (nodes = entities, edges = schema.org relations + sameAs links)
  5. Analytics → ClickHouse (entity snapshots, usage events, search logs, KG stats, quality metrics)

If you want one “default answer”

If you must pick a starting point that won’t paint you into a corner:

If you share 3 things—(1) expected scale (#entities, QPS), (2) your top 5 queries, (3) whether you need real-time updates—I can suggest the exact entity/edge/index shapes (and what to keep in each system).

ChatGPT can make mistakes. OpenAI doesn’t use Sylk.AI workspace data to train its models.

Discover more from Product's Point of View

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading