Chat history
You said:
what is the best data base to store schema.org data
ChatGPT said:
Thought for 8s
There isn’t one “best” database for Schema.org data—because Schema.org is a vocabulary, and the right storage depends on how you’ll query and evolve the data.
If you want a practical default
PostgreSQL (with JSONB) is usually the best starting point:
- Store the raw JSON-LD you ingest (flexible as Schema.org changes).
- Add indexes on the few fields you query a lot (e.g.,
@type,name,url,identifier,sameAs). - Easy ops, great tooling, and you can still do relational tables later for “hot” entities.
If your main value is relationships and traversal
Use a graph database (property graph), like Neo4j, when you’ll ask questions like:
- “Find all Restaurants in Bangalore that are in the same
containedInPlaceas venues hosting Events by X” - “Traverse
sameAs/provider/offers/itemOfferedchains”
Graph DBs are great for deep joins and neighborhood queries.
If you need standards-based semantic querying (Linked Data)
Use an RDF triplestore / SPARQL engine (e.g., GraphDB, Virtuoso, Jena/Fuseki, Amazon Neptune’s RDF mode) when:
- You want SPARQL queries
- You care about RDF compatibility, interchange, ontologies, or reasoning/inference
- Your data model is closer to “triples” than “documents”
Common “best in practice” architecture
Many teams do a hybrid:
- Store raw JSON-LD in Postgres (JSONB) or object storage (source of truth)
- Build a derived graph view (Neo4j/Neptune) for relationship queries
- Optionally index into Elasticsearch/OpenSearch for fast text search (“typeahead”, ranking, fuzzy matching)
Quick chooser
- CRUD + flexible schema + moderate querying → Postgres JSONB
- Relationship-heavy queries → Neo4j / graph DB
- SPARQL + RDF interoperability → RDF triplestore
If you tell me what you’re doing with the Schema.org data (search? knowledge graph? analytics? dedupe via sameAs? SPARQL needed?), I’ll recommend a specific setup and schema pattern.
You said:
search and knowledge graph, analytics and intelligence as well
ChatGPT said:
Thought for 19s
For search + knowledge graph + analytics/intelligence on Schema.org (JSON-LD), the “best database” is almost always a stack (each layer does what it’s best at).
Recommended “best-in-practice” stack
1) System of record (raw + canonical entities)
PostgreSQL (JSONB)
- Store raw JSON-LD payloads + a canonical “Entity” record per
@id/URL/identifier. - Use GIN indexes for JSONB containment/path queries and for some document-style filtering. PostgreSQL+1
This keeps you flexible as Schema.org types/properties evolve.
2) Search layer (fast relevance + faceting)
OpenSearch
- Use it for full-text relevance (BM25), filters, and aggregations (facets, counts, distributions). OpenSearch Docs+1
- If you’re doing “intelligence” features (semantic/hybrid search), OpenSearch supports combining hybrid search + aggregations (useful for “semantic results + faceted drilldowns”). OpenSearch Docs
3) Knowledge graph layer (relationships, traversal, reasoning-ish queries)
Neo4j (property graph) is a strong default if your queries are traversal-heavy and you want a mature developer experience with Cypher. Graph Database & Analytics+1
Use this for things like entity resolution graphs (sameAs clusters), offers → itemOffered, containedInPlace, provider, “paths between entities”, etc.
4) Analytics layer (OLAP + BI)
ClickHouse (or a cloud warehouse) for fast OLAP over events, entity snapshots, and derived features. ClickHouse is explicitly oriented toward large-scale analytical workloads. ClickHouse+1
How the pieces fit together
- Ingest JSON-LD → Postgres (raw)
- Normalize → canonical entities + extracted fields (name, geo, type, category, timestamps, popularity signals)
- Index for search → OpenSearch (documents per entity + per page + per offer/event, depending on your product)
- Build KG → Neo4j (nodes = entities, edges = schema.org relations +
sameAslinks) - Analytics → ClickHouse (entity snapshots, usage events, search logs, KG stats, quality metrics)
If you want one “default answer”
If you must pick a starting point that won’t paint you into a corner:
- Postgres (JSONB) + OpenSearch, then add Neo4j when relationship queries become core, and ClickHouse when analytics volume/latency needs it.
If you share 3 things—(1) expected scale (#entities, QPS), (2) your top 5 queries, (3) whether you need real-time updates—I can suggest the exact entity/edge/index shapes (and what to keep in each system).
ChatGPT can make mistakes. OpenAI doesn’t use Sylk.AI workspace data to train its models.
